

The White House has repeatedly stated that President Barack Obama, who visited the kingdom in April in a bid to soothe strained ties, opposes the law because it would essentially waive the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
- “This legislation would change long-standing, international law regarding sovereign immunity. And the president of the United States continues to harbour serious concerns that this legislation would make the United States vulnerable in other court systems around the world,”
- White House spokesman Josh Earnest said. He explained that the United States was more engaged internationally “than any other country in the world,” particularly in peacekeeping and humanitarian operations.
- Undermining immunity, he said, would put Americans working abroad at risk. The bill would allow 9/11 families to pursue cases in federal court against foreign governments, notably Saudi Arabia, and demand compensation if such governments are proven to bear some responsibility for the attacks.

In February Zacarias Moussaoui, dubbed the 20th hijacker, told US lawyers that members of the Saudi
royal family donated millions of dollars to Al-Qaeda in the 1990s.

The Saudi Embassy denied Moussaoui’s claims. But his accusations revived debate over whether the Obama administration should release a still-classified 28-page section of the 9/11 Commission Report.

House Speaker Ryan, a Republican, has expressed hesitation about bringing the bill to the floor for a vote.

The two Democratic presidential candidates, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton and Senator Bernie Sanders, have expressed support for the bill, whose main sponsors are Democrat Chuck Schumer and his Republican colleague John Cornyn.
Post a Comment